Chelsea Away

March 2, 2023

Useful Away Information


Please take note of the AWAY Supporter Entry System and Requirements!!!

CHELSEA

Stamford Bridge (capacity 41,663)

Stamford Bridge is currently the eighth largest stadium in the country, and the club has plans to expand the capacity to over 60,000 in the coming years. It has undergone a number of major changes since it was first built, most recently in the 1990’s when it was renovated into a modern, all seater stadium.

 

Both East and West Stands are three tiered, with the latter an impressive and modern looking stand with a transparent roof which allows a greater amount of light on to the pitch. The two end stands are two tiered, with the Matthew Harding Stand said to be the loudest of the home stands.


Away fans visiting Stamford Bridge are located in the Shed End lower tier, nearest the East Stand, with a typical allocation of 3,000.

 

Founded: 1905 | Web: www.chelseafc.com | Phone: 0871 984 1955


Important Information for Coaches and LUSN Supporters Travel


Coaches must be booked into the car park or they will receive a Parking Charge Notice. To book please use the link Coach Booking Chelsea


Coaches will be parked on the Imperial Road


There will be three stages to approach the Away stand turnstiles.


1st Stage

At Stamford Gate where supporters will be allowed through a cordon when it is safe to do so to avoid congestion


2nd Stage

will be a cordon to check supporters are in possession of tickets


3rd stage

where supporters will be searched and Pyrotechnic and Narcotics dogs will be active


Note that Supporters will be offered same gender searching by the stewards


Alcohol will be served pre-match and at half time.

Kiosks will serve beyond half time if their is still demand.


Alcohol is not allowed to be consumed in the streets and offenders will have this confiscated from them by the police.

 

Homophobic behavior's and chanting will not be tolerated and will likely see those offenders arrested.


Metropolitan Police do not envisage any holding back of away supporters unless there is a serious likelihood of post match disorder. 




Car Parks


Parking is extremely limited around Stamford Bridge, with a parking restriction zone within a few miles radius of the stadium. There are usually some spaces around Waltham Green (SW6 2AF) but these spaces tend to get taken early on matchday. Public transport is probably more advisable and the nearest Tube station is Fulham Broadway.

We’ve compiled a list of car parks, below, near to Stamford Bridge for hassle free parking while you’re at the match.

 

Car Park: Chelsea and Westminster Hospital

Sat Nav: SW10 9NH

Cost:  £15

Distance to Ground: 0.8km

Description:  A short 10 minutes walk from Stamford Bridge is the underground car park at the Chelsea and Westminster Hospital. On match day, this car park does become very busy so please get there early if you intend to drive.


Travel by train


The nearest tube station to Stamford Bridge is Fulham Broadway, which is on the District Line. This would be a good option if travelling into London Kings Cross by train.


The nearest over ground train station is West Brompton. This station is served by trains from Clapham Junction, which itself is served by trains from London Waterloo and Victoria stations. It’s around a 15 minute walk to Stamford Bridge from West Brompton station. As you exit the station, turn right and head down Old Brompton Road. You’ll see Brompton Cemetery on your right. Enter the Cemetery, and as you walk through you will see Stamford Bridge appear.


Alternatively, if it is a night game, it’s not advisable to walk through the cemetery. Instead, take the next right on to Finborough Road. After around 800m, turn right onto Fulham Road and the stadium is located on the right.

 

Away Pubs


Prince of Tek

161 Earls Court Road, London SW5 9RQ

prince of tek link


The Courtfield Tavern

187 Earls Court Road, London, SW5 9AN

courtfield tavern link


The Blackbird

209 Earls Court Rd, London, SW5 9AN

blackbird link



March 16, 2026
The Leeds United Supporters’ Network (LUSN) strongly condemns the Jimmy Savile chanting heard from sections of the crowd during yesterday’s fixture between Crystal Palace vs Leeds United at Selhurst Park yesterday, Sunday 15th March 2026. Like with previous matches for many seasons, Home or Away, these chants are offensive, harmful and have no place in football or wider society. Beyond the obvious offence caused, the impact of these chants is far deeper. Research and testimony highlighted by LUSN ( see here - https://lusn.co.uk/jimmy-savile-chants ) shows that references to Savile can act as powerful triggers for survivors of sexual abuse, bringing back traumatic memories and causing genuine psychological distress. As charity leader Gabrielle Shaw (CEO of NAPAC ) explained, what may appear to some as “banter” can “hit with the force of a physical blow” for survivors hearing it in a packed stadium or while watching the match at home. We have consistently supported the call for Savile-related chants to be formally recognised within the scope of tragedy chanting legislation. We strongly urge football’s authorities, clubs and supporters — alongside the Football Supporters' Association — to support this effort and implement measures that ensure this abuse is addressed with the seriousness it demands. LUSN Committee Board
March 6, 2026
The Leeds United Supporters’ Network (LUSN) The Leeds United Supporters Network (LUSN) welcomes the statement issued by Leeds United F.C. ahead of Sunday’s FA Cup fixture with Norwich City F.C. - LINK We appreciate the club acknowledging that greater communication prior to the Manchester City fixture would have helped supporters better understand the circumstances around the pause in play. This recognition reflects a key point raised in our statement earlier this week regarding the role that insufficient communication contributed to confusion inside Elland Road. We also welcome the club’s reflection on several mitigating factors which may have influenced supporters’ reactions, including stadium messaging limitations and the context of previous fixtures. Recognising these elements is an important step toward ensuring situations such as this are better managed and understood in the future. Our full statement outlining our position and concerns can be read here - https://lusn.co.uk/lusn-statement-040326a LUSN looks forward to working more closely with the club, the Leeds United Supporters Trust, and Leeds supporters everywhere to strengthen communication, representation and collaboration, as we collectively strive to restore both the club and its reputation to where we all believe it should be. LUSN Committee Board
March 4, 2026
The Leeds United Supporters’ Network (LUSN) wishes to formally respond to recent correspondence and public commentary concerning events at the recent fixture involving Leeds United F.C.. First and foremost, LUSN fully supports equality, inclusion and respect within football. We recognise the importance of religious observance and the need for sensitivity around such matters. However, the subsequent public narrative surrounding this incident has been incomplete, unbalanced, and in several respects inaccurate. 1. Stewarding and Matchday Management It is our understanding that insufficient communication and coordination from the club contributed to confusion in the stadium. Greater clarity from Leeds United F.C. and match officials prior to and during the fixture could have mitigated misunderstanding and reduced the reaction witnessed. 2. Crowd Reaction Misrepresented It is incorrect to suggest that the reaction came solely from Leeds United supporters. Audio and broadcast footage indicate that any audible booing was not confined to one section of the ground. The public characterisation of this as an issue attributable to “ Leeds fans ” is therefore misleading. 3. Broadcast Scheduling Considerations Broadcasters were reportedly aware of the potential need to accommodate fasting requirements. There was opportunity within the broadcast schedule to implement a short delay (approximately 15 minutes) which may have prevented disruption during active play. This option was not taken. That context has not been acknowledged in subsequent commentary. 4. Lack of Consultation Despite statements implying dialogue with supporter bodies, neither LUSN nor other recognised Leeds United fan groups were consulted by the Football Supporters' Association or Kick It Out prior to public statements being issued. Any suggestion that supporter groups were engaged in forming those responses is incorrect. 5. Timing and Tone of Public Statements The statement issued by Kick It Out approximately one hour after full-time attributed blame to “some Leeds fans” We question whether a representative was present at the match and whether a more measured, fact-based assessment would have been more constructive. Rapid, reactive statements risk inflaming rather than resolving situations. 6. Context Omitted No reference was made to wider context, including discussion following the reverse fixture at Etihad Stadium last November, where second-half events prompted widespread debate about competitive integrity, tactical pauses, and perceived advantage. For many supporters, reactions were influenced by that prior experience. Ignoring this context oversimplifies a complex situation. 7. Competitive and Regulatory Questions There remains a legitimate question as to whether the participation of all 11 players in such pauses is clearly defined within competition regulations, or whether it can be construed — rightly or wrongly — as creating an unintended competitive advantage. This topic was widely debated following the Etihad fixture. Supporters expressing views on such matters falls within the bounds of freedom of expression, provided it does not cross into discriminatory conduct. The issues at hand have been conflated. A complex scenario involving scheduling, communication, competitive fairness, religious observance, and supporter reaction has been reduced to a simplified narrative that places blame squarely on “ some Leeds fans ” That portrayal does not accurately reflect the full picture. We are concerned about the precedent set when national organisations issue statements without consulting local supporter groups and without fully establishing facts. Oversimplification risks deepening division and undermining trust between supporters and governing bodies. LUSN remains committed to constructive dialogue with clubs, governing authorities, and equality organisations. We urge all parties to approach sensitive matters with balance, thorough consultation, and a willingness to consider the broader context. Football thrives on passion, diversity and debate. Those values must be protected responsibly and fairly for all. Leeds United Supporters Network Committee Board - Wednesday 4th March 2026 Image Courtesy of Express Newspapers
Show More